COMPARE AND CONTRAST BOURDIEU'S APPROACH TO THE AGENCY/STRUCTURE DICHOTOMY WITH THAT OF GIDDENS

COMPARE AND CONTRAST BOURDIEUS APPROACH TO THE AGENCY/STRUCTURE duality WITH THAT OF GIDDENS In recent years, several authors cast attempted to dole out with the problem of the relationship between office and social organize. This has manifested itself in the theory of structuration. Anthony Giddens structuration theory is wizard of the known and most articulated efforts to integrate agency and structure. His theory proposes a duality of structure, in that agency and structure cannot be seen as independent of maven another. Pierre Bourdieu is another all-important(a) idealogue to contribute to this agency-structure debate. His theory of human body and field is concerned in the first place with overcoming the resistor between objectivism and subjectivism. While there are galore(postnominal) differences between these deuce theories, there are in withalt a fewer similarities. Both Bourdieu and Giddens put forward a duality of structure, and they are also some(pre nominal) involved with the start of constraint on agents. Similarly, Bourdieus habitus can be colligate to Giddenss theory of structure. In order to fully understand the comparisons and secernate issues between Bourdieu and Giddens, it is important to look at each theorists construct separately, and then to discuss the issues which arise. Giddens proposes that agency and structure cannot be conceived of obscure from one another. In other words, they are two sides of the analogous coin.

You cannot have one without the other. He puts forward that agency and structure should be viewed as the duality of structure. By this he pith that s ocial structures are both constituted by hum! an agency, and insofar at the same time are the very forte of this constitution (Thompson, 1989: 58). He even goes so far as to advance that every research probe in the social sciences or narrative is involved in relating action [often used synonymously with agency] to structure (Ritzer, 2004: 509). If you deficiency to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay