The courts have , by decisions made on particular cases , made an effort to get into the recommendations made by the committee to reduce the hardship and unnecessary inconvenience that the doctrine of consideration may cause Cases such(prenominal) as Williams v Roffey Bros Nicholls (Contractors ) Pty Ltd Trident habitual Insurance Co Ltd v McNiece Bros Pty Ltd , and Waltons Stores (Interstate ) Ltd v Maher are few cases that the courts have used as a vehicle to correct in place some of the recommendations made by the English Law Revision CommitteeConsideration can best be delimit as per Sir Fredrick Pollock : An act or forbearance of one party or the phone thereof , is the price for which the engagement of the other is bought and the promise so given for revalue is enforceable The basic rules of consideration are that Consideration moldiness be present in both `simple contract Consideration can be `executory or `executed , though it can non be ` outg oing , as past consideration is no consideration Consideration must move from the promisee though not necessarily to the promisor Consideration does not have to be nice , in that the consideration lamentable from the promisee must have value by which the law leave recognise , but does not necessarily have to meditate the value of the promise made to the promisee Consideration must not be so light that it becomes illusory And that consideration must be sufficient , thereby being recognisable in the eyes of the lawThe English Law Revision Committee recommended that the prospect should be taken to groom away from the doctrine those aspects of it which take in hardship or cause unnecessary inconvenience The aspects the Committee refers...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.